User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > Bribery
Which one is more hurting, outbound bribery or inbound bribery?
By Henry Chen | 2017/10/24 23:20:56

Outbound bribery brings governmental punishments directly to a company, which appears hurting.  However, inbound bribery (as well as some other internal frauds) is more harmful in terms of financial losses, which could be as much as 4% of the total revenue of a company.  


In-bound bribery is more difficult to detect, so are other internal frauds such as embezzlements, conflict-of-interest transactions, which go hand to hand without exception.  The internal frauds could remain “unseen” for a very long time until the time of the “broken arrow”.  When that moment comes up, your breath could be taken away, which we can learn from the case study on FAW Group (i.e., the First Auto Work) – one of the earliest and biggest auto manufacturers in China.


The former chairman of the FAW Group, Mr. Xu, Jianyi, took bribes around RMB 12 million (approximately US$ 1.8 million) from the legal representative of a local Changchun transportation company.  As a result, Mr. Xu was given a sentence of imprisonment of 11 years and 6 months.  In addition, there are some other corruption and bribery cases in relation to FAW Group or its affiliated companies as the table below indicates:

 

Year of Conviction

Person

Company

Title

Crime

Term of Imprisonment

2017

Mr. Xu, Jianyi (徐建一)

FAW中国第一汽车集团公司

Chairman

Taking bribes of RMB12 million US$ 1.8 million

11.5 years

2016

Mr. An, Dewu (安德武)

FAW中国第一汽车集团公司

Deputy GM

Embezzling and taking bribes of 11 million (about US$ 1.6 million)

14 years

2015

Mr. Zhang, Xiaojun (张晓军)

FAW Sales Company (一汽轿车销售公司)

GM

Case result not clear

FAW-VW Sales Co./Audi Division一汽-大众销售公司奥迪事业部

Executive Vice GM

2015

Mr. Zhou, Yongjiang (周勇江)

FAW-VW一汽大众汽车公司

Vice Chief Economist

Taking bribes of RMB 17 million (about US$ 2.5 million)

15 years

FAW-VW Sales Co., Ltd. 一汽大众销售公司

General Manager

2014

Mr. Shi, Tao (石涛)

FAW-VW Sales Co. 一汽大众销售公司

Vice Executive GM

Taking bribes of RMB 33 million (about US$ 4.85 million) and un-resourceful income of RMB 27 million (or USD 4 million)

Life

imprisonment

2014 (case disclosed)

Mr. Li, Wu (李武)

FAW-VW一汽大众汽车公司

Vice GM

Case result not clear

FAW-VW Sales Co., Ltd. 一汽大众销售公司

GM

2014 (case disclosed)

Mr. Zhou, Chun (周纯)

FAW-VW/Audi Sales Division一汽大众汽车公司奥迪销售事业部

Vice GM

2013

Mr. Xiong, Guosong (熊国松)

FAW-VW Sales Co., Ltd. 一汽大众销售公司

Deputy GM

Taking bribes of RMB 90 millionabout US$ 13 million

Death penalty with 2-year suspension


The checklist is not exhaustive.  There are some other cases which are less significant than the ones provided in the table.  We will talk more about the subject matter in the future.

Licensed to practice law in China and the New York State of the USA., Henry Chen is a senior partner of Beijing Dacheng Law Offices, LLP (Shanghai) (AKA Dentons Shanghai Office).  Henry was the former AP Compliance Director of Ford Motor Company.  Henry is the author of Risk Management of Commercial Bribery in China.  Henry is available at Henry.chen@dentons.cn



Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号