User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > Anti-Bribery & Fraud
Fight Bribery in Chinese Pharma Industry, New Trick or Old One?
By Henry Chen | 2013/11/4 0:34:23

It is reported that the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and the State-assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) are going to mobilize nine industry associations to launch a system to evaluate the creditability rate on pharmaceutical enterprises.  In addition, MOFCOM and SASAC are going to jointly work with the National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) to establish and streamline the creditability system of the whole pharmaceutical industry, by which bad records on pharmaceutical enterprises will be collected and archived.

 

It is also reported that the Ministry of Public Affairs (MPA), in charge of investigating the economic crimes, is phasing out of the investigation of pharmaceutical enterprises.  However, NHFPC is talking the initiative in establishing a steering team in combating commercial bribery, and the team is going to do some “undercover” inspection on the possible bribery incidents in various provinces.  However, it is not clear how the inspections would be “undercovered.”

 

Actually, the predecessor of NHFPC, the Ministry of Health, adopted a blacklisting system, by which each province could archive the bribing enterprises that bribed around and were punished in the province.  The blacklisted enterprises were then prohibited from engaging in bidding and tendering in the concerned blacklisting province.  However, the blacklisting system was not totally run and maintained effectively.  Some provinces are quite active in running the blacking system, but some provinces are not.  For example, the blacking system of some province is protected by pass code.  However, nobody knows where to get the pass code to log into the blacking system to see what are the enterprises so blacklisted.  It remains to be seen if the new system of NHFPC would be better.

 


In 2006, China did a similar campaign to fight bribery in pharmaceutical industry, which caused a great impact on the industry.  There were 1310 enterprises losing as much as RMB 4.4 billion (approximately US$ 733 million).


 

You may follow the link for the news in Chinese.

 

* Licensed in the PRC and the New York State of the U.S., Henry Chen, the author, is a Shanghai-based partner at MWE China Law Offices in stratetic alliance with McDermott Will and Emery.

 

Henry has extensive experience representing enterprises in administrative and criminal investigations of alleged commercial bribery cases;  providing counsel for the investigation of employee misconducts; helping clients conduct pre-merger due diligence investigations and post-merger integrations; providing training and seminars in Chinese and English to the employees of MNCs regarding anti-corruption and bribery pitfalls; providing FCPA investigations and auditing for the presence of American companies in China and for companies listed in the U.S.; helping companies update and strengthen their internal anti-corruption compliance programs and controls and tailoring them to the unique features of Asian markets.

 

Henry’s research about FCPA enforcement and Chinese anti-bribery and -corruption law has been published or quoted in leading publications, including the Bloomberg Asia Pacific Law Report, Wall Street Journal, China Law & Practice and ALB.  Henry is also the host of Linkedin groups: "Compliance in China” and “Anti-Corruption Compliance Asia.”

 

Henry is available at henrychen@mwechinalaw.com

 

 

Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号