User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > Personal Information
An Incriminating Board Decision of D&B in Violation of Chinese Privacy Law
By The Compliance Reviews | 2013/11/5 23:59:20

On November 1, 2013, Compliance in China (www.ComplianceinChina.com) organized a seminar on Bribery Risk Management in China for various multinational and domestic companies.  The keynote speakers include Henry Chen (cn.linkedin.com/in/henrylitongchen) as well as some high-leveled governmental officials from Administration for Industry and Commerce (“AIC”), the Public Security Bureau and the Prosecuting Office.  The keynote speeches covered many interesting topics such as what compliance officers can learn from GSK case, what are the perspectives of an AIC official toward bribery under Chinese administrative law, what usually kicks off an administrative or criminal investigation, what are the elements of a unit crime.  During the seminar, a recent criminal case on Dun & Bradstreet (“D&B”) was mentioned about how the prosecutor met the intentional element to prosecute the criminal case against D&B.

 

On September 28, 2012, Dun & Bradstreet’s local operating subsidiary Shanghai Roadway D&B Marketing Services Co., Ltd. (“Roadway”) was charged by the Shanghai public prosecutor with “illegally obtaining private information from Chinese citizens.”  As reported by the Chinese press, the private information included the personal data of 150 million Chinese citizens, including their income, job titles, and addresses.

 

On January 9, 2013, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Shanghai Zhabei District Court found Roadway guilty of illegally purchasing the personal information of private citizens and fined the company RMB $1 million (US $160,648).  Because this crime is a unit crime (or the crime committed by a non-individual entity), China law imposes responsibility for the crime committed by such a unit also on a couple of categories of individuals – “the  responsible persons who are directly in charge” (直接负责的主管人员) and “the other persons who are directly responsible” (其他直接责任人员).  As such, four employees involved in the illegal purchase were also sentenced to up to two years in jail and each fined between RMB $5,000 to RMB $10,000 (US $800 to $1600).  The four employees included Roadway’s President Mr. Cui, the Data and Operation Director Mr. Li, a data manager Mr. Wang and a data collector Mr. Sun.  Because this crime of “illegally obtaining private information from Chinese citizens”  is an intentional crime, the prosecutor had to prove the Roadway and all of the four persons committed the crime intentionally. 

 

In September of 2011, Mr. Wang and Mr. Sun got to know from a similar case taking place in Beijing that it might be illegitimate to purchase the private information from Chinese citizens.  Mr. Wang and Mr. Sun sent an email to Mr. Cui and Mr. Li as well as Mr. Yuan – the Data and Operation Director of the Greater China of D&B (Hong Kong).  Roadway also consulted with its lawyer about whether or not it is legal to do the purchase.  However, the lawyer did not say yes or no.  Instead, the lawyer proposed Roadway to change the title of the concerned contract from “The Contract of Purchasing Information and Data” (信息数据采购合同) to “The Contract on the Advice and Consultation for Commercial Data” (商业资讯咨询顾问合同) so as to mitigate risk exposure as the lawyer hoped.  Probably on the basis of the “optimistic” opinion of the lawyer, a board decision was adopted by Roadway (a subsidiary company of D&B in China) to continuously purchase the privacy data, and the board decision becomes a perfect incriminating evidence to prove the Roadway and the other four accused individuals intentionally committed the crime of breaching privacy.

 


- Henry Chen, licensed to practice law in China and New York, is a senior partner of Dentons Shanghai Office.  Before joining Dentons, Henry was AP Compliance Director of Ford.  Henry is the legal counsel of one of the biggest Internet search engine companies for its autonomous driving projects covering data integrity and security, protection of commercial secrets under the context of cyber security, compliance with Cyber Security Law, autonomous survey and mapping, privacy, risk management on autonomous driving accidents and car call-back, risk management on network penetration and safety.  In addition to TMT areas, Henry also handles traditional compliance issues on FCPA, anti-fraud investigation, compliance management system, corporate matters and dispute resolutions.  Henry's email is Henry.Chen@dentons.cn

 


Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号