User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > Anti-Monopoly Law
MOFCOM Clears 1 Case Every 4 Days
By The Compliance Reviews | 2013/11/12 16:47:20

In response to the inquiry of a National People’s Congressman, the Ministry of Commerce of China (“MOFCOM”) expressed that MOFCOM is making the Implementation Rules on Antimonopoly Examination on Concentrations of Business Operators (the “Rules”) to implement Chapter 4 of Anti-Monopoly Law. 

 

In the past five years, MOFCOM handled more than 700 cases.  Recently, the cases that MOFCOM handles are exploding.  On average, MOFCOM has to close a case within four days, which becomes a mission impossible without reforming MOFCOM’s case-reviewing system.  One of the reforms to adopt is a simplistic mechanism to expedite the examinations of simple cases, which then results in another issue: what is a simple case?

 

According to the Interim Regulations on Applicable Standards for Simple Business Operator Concentration Cases (Draft for Comments) (the “Draft Interim Regulations”), following concentrations would fall within the category of a simple case:

- Within a single relevant market, the total market shares of all of the business operators participating in a concentration are less than 15%;

- Each of the business operators participating in a concentration has less than 25% market shares if the business operators have upstream-downstream relationship;

- Each of the business operators participating in a concentration has less than 25% market shares as long as the business operators do not have upstream-downstream relationship;

- The business operators set up a joint venture outside China, and the joint venture does not engage in any business activities within China;

- A business operator participating in a concentration acquires the equity interests or assets of an overseas enterprise and the overseas enterprise does not engage in the business activities within China; or

- A joint venture that was previously jointly controlled by two or more than two business operators is solely controlled by one of the business operators or jointly controlled by more than one of the business operators.

 

The Draft Interim Regulations was promulgated to seek comments in April of 2013 as far as May 2, 2013.  Because both the Rules and the Draft Interim Regulations mentioned the simplistic case-reviewing mechanism, it seems that such a mechanism will become a sure thing.  In addition, four days a case seems too much even for MOFCOM.

 

 

Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号