User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > National & State Security
Those on the Radar of the State Security Committee of China
By The Compliance Reviews | 2013/11/14 22:15:46

The Third Plenary Meeting of the 18th Party Central Committee of the Communist Party of China decided to establish a State Security Committee.  This part of the decision is presented at the sector of social governance for the purpose of improving the national security system and the country's security strategy.  It seems that the State Security Committee would be relevant more with maintaining internal domestic order than with safeguarding national security against foreign interference and invasion, which is collaborated with the explanations of the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. QIN Gang.

 

On November 13, 2013, in answering the inquiry of a journalist upon the purpose of China to set up the State Security Committee, Mr. Qin said the purpose is to improve the national security system and the country's security strategy.  In furtherance, Mr. Qin said the State Security Committee would make three kinds of people nervous, which are terrorists, separators, and extremists.  In short, all of the forces trying to threaten and sabotage the State security of China are sure to get nervous. 

 

It remains to be seen how the three kinds of people would be defined in practice and in law.  If it is easy to understand, by common sense though, what are the terrorists and separators, it is unclear who would fall within the definition of extremists. 

 

Compared with the “state security” as the safeguarding target of the State Security Committee to be established in China, there is “national security” as the regulatory target of the State Council regarding the merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions by foreign investors in China.

 

On  February 3, 2011, the State Council promulgated the “Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Launching the Security Review Mechanism for Mergers and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors” (the Notice), which established the national security review system for M&A transactions by foreign investors in China.  On August 25, 2011, after a trial period of about six months of an interim regulation on the security review system, on August 25, 2011, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) finalized and issued the “Regulation on Implementing of the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors” (the Regulation), which came into effect  September 1, 2011.  As you may see, the national security review system as established and specified under the Notice and the Regulation may have a broad impact on prospective foreign M&A transactions in China, but have nothing to do with “improving the national security system and the country's security strategy.  An M&A of Chinese enterprise by foreign investors in China shall go through security review if foreign investors take de facto control of the Chinese enterprise and the Chinese enterprise is:

·         -A military or military-related enterprise surrounding a key or sensitive military infrastructure or a unit otherwise related to the military

·         -A national security-related enterprise regarding an important agricultural product, important energy and resource, important infrastructure, important transportation, key technology or major equipment manufacturing

 

By the way, there is no difference between “state security” and “national security” in Chinese.  They both are written as 国家安全 in characters or guo jia an quan in pinyin.

 

 

 

Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号