User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
Home > Compliance
China Set to Reform Company Registered Capital Regime
By Karen Ip | 2013/12/5 19:20:25

China recently indicated that it will reform the current registered capital requirements for companies in China. The changes, once made, will significantly simplify foreign investment in China.

 

The reform plans were announced by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang at an executive meeting of the State Council on 25 October 2013. The goal of the reform is to support a faster pace of economic reform and to encourage investment in China. Highlights of the reform include changing the current paid-up capital regime to a subscribed capital regime, lifting minimum registered capital requirements and relaxing timing requirements for capital contribution. With these changes, China plans to align its company registration system with international practice.

 

The State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) is currently coordinating with various governmental bodies to amend the Chinese Company Law and to promulgate new regulations in order to implement the reform. SAIC officials have stated that, based on the principle of national treatment, all foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs) will benefit from the new rules.

 

Following a brief explanation of “total investment” and “registered capital” under the current foreign investment regime, we outline below the current rules and indicate how they can be expected to change:

 

Total investment and registered capital

An FIE must have a registered capital and a total investment.

 

Registered capital is the total amount of equity made by the investors to the FIE, which must be paid in accordance with time schedules prescribed by law.

 

Total investment is the projected amount of capital necessary for the FIE to be established and become operational. An FIE may borrow foreign exchange loans up to the difference between its registered capital and total investment.

 

An FIE’s registered capital is subject to a fixed proportion of its total investment. For instance, an FIE with a total investment of up to US$3 million must be funded by at least 70% registered capital. This limits the amount of foreign debt that an FIE can incur.

 

Under the proposed reform, investors of an FIE may contractually agree on the capital to be subscribed. They may also agree on the form and timing of contributions. However, other than the matters set out below, it is unclear whether or how the proposed reform will impact China’s overall foreign investment regime.

 

Minimum amounts of registered capital

 

Timing of capital contributions

 

Capital verification

 

Our observations

While the direction of reform is good news for foreign investors, the actual benefits derived will depend very much on the implementing details. For instance, we do not yet know whether the concept of total investment will still be applicable. As the difference between total investment and registered capital limits an FIE’s foreign exchange borrowing capacity, it is unclear whether the reform will impact foreign exchange financing of FIEs.

 

Another area of uncertainty, at this stage, relates to the FIE approval regime. Under the current FIE approval regime, the total investment is one of the factors to determine whether an FIE is subject to approval at the municipal, provincial or central level. If the concept of total investment is abolished along with the concept of registered capital, then the FIE approval system will also need to be revised. It may be that China is contemplating a registration-only system for FIEs, similar to the one being rolled out in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone.

 

The relaxation of registered capital requirements confirms that the Chinese authorities are planning to transform the post-establishment supervision of companies in China. New policies in this respect were announced in the same State Council’s executive meeting. The announced policies include replacement of the current enterprise annual inspection system with a more transparent and unified annual reporting system whereby annual reports of enterprises will be made available to the public. In addition, it was announced that an enterprise credit system would be developed so that non-compliant companies can be “blacklisted” on a publicly available register.

 

Foreign investors and FIEs in China should keep a close eye out for the implementing laws and regulations. Subject to the announced details, implementation of the reform could well be some of the most significant foreign investment changes over the last decade.

 

* Karen Ip, a partner of Herbert Smith Freehills, is principally involved in private equity investment projects, merger and acquisition transactions and greenfield investments in the manufacturing, infrastructure and financial institution sectors. She also advises on regulatory issues in China.

 

 

Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author:   
Email:    (optional)
URL:    (optional)
Content:  
    
  Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been cleared by a website editor.
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号