User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ China’s Market Regulator Reined in Internet Commercial Ads
▪ Stricter than the GDPR, China’s Privacy Law Provides Prohibitive and Control Oblig
▪ China kicked off the 1st national security review on DiDi
▪ Non-prosecution for compliance under ISO 37301 - Dentons lawyers take the world’s
▪ China’s Data Security Law is anything but frightening
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law Awards Meaningful Credits for Compliance Eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
 
It has been typical under PRC law for bribe takers to be punished more severely than bribe givers. The policy was to punish extortion and incentivize cooperation with government investigations. But as recent investigations into the sales practices of big pharmaceutical companies have shown, this policy may be changing.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

Three international organizations just released the Anti-Corruption Ethics and Compliance Handbook for Business.  The three organizations include the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the World Bank.  Hereinafter is the self-explanatory message from the OECD, the UNODC and the World Bank.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

If a local manager in China pays bribes and is liable under the law, could his or her supervising executives in the U.S. or Europe also be held criminally responsible? Or should they shrug off the possible liabilities by claiming “the mountain is high, the emperor is far away?”

China law imposes responsibility for crimes committed by business “units” (such as bribery) on a couple of categories of individuals -- “the responsible persons who are directly in charge” (直接负责的主管人员) and “the other persons who are directly responsible” (其他直接责任人员).



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

China's antitrust watchdog, the National Development and Reform Commission, has launched an investigation into Qualcomm.  The NDRC is keeping its investigation confidential right now but is examining the company through the lens of the country's anti-monopoly law, Qualcomm said on Monday November 25, 2013. Since details on the investigation are confidential, there's no telling at the moment what the country could be looking at with Qualcomm.

 



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

The lawyer did not tell them “yes or no” regarding legality.  He instead proposed that Roadway change the title of their purchase contracts from “Contract for Purchasing Information and Data” to “Contract on the Advice and Consultation for Commercial Data,” as though that would in some way help. In light of the lawyer’s advice, Roadway continued purchasing the private data and that decision became “perfect incriminating evidence to prove that Roadway and the other four accused individuals intentionally committed the crime of breaching privacy.”



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

According to Mr. LU Yanchun, a Deputy Director of the Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission (the “NDRC”), the NDRC is going to tighten up the law enforcement in the industries of aviation (presumably retailing services), everyday chemicals, automobiles, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and household electric appliances. 



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

US Securities and Exchange Commission issued 2013 Annual Report to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program (the “Annual Report”).  Under the program, individuals who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information that leads to a successful enforcement action with sanctions over US$ 1 million may be eligible for an award of 10% to 30% of the money collected by the SEC or other enforcement agencies. 

The SEC has now received 6,573 tips and complaints since the whistleblower program started in August 2011, the Annual Report said.  In Fiscal Year 2013, 3,238 whistleblower TCRs (short for “Tips, Complaints, and Referrals”) were received, 52 of which are from China.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
Many factors attribute to the difficulty in enforcement of court judgments, one of which is that a debtor does not have too much to fear.  It seems that the Supreme People’s Court (the “SPC”) is doing something to make it look more fearsome, so is the People’s Bank of China (the “PBOC”).  On November 14, 2013, the PBOC and SPC reached the Cooperative Consensus on Incorporating Name List Information of Breach-of-Trust Persons Subject to Execution into Credit Reporting System.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
PAGE TOTAL 109
12
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8
沪ICP备19033746号-4
沪公网安备31010502002477号